tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135631617909056282024-03-14T02:15:33.812-04:00Consider This . . . Amherst News-Times columnist offering perspectives on politics, science and social issues.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.comBlogger301125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-22247258990191230422018-08-28T20:51:00.001-04:002018-08-28T20:51:47.154-04:00300. Column 300 and The EndI wrote my first column for the Lorain County Community Newspapers in 2003.<br />
<br />
I was at Ohio State University taking a three-week course that was required to get my license in health care administration. It was a rough time — I was working two jobs through my internship at $8 per hour. I stayed in an awful motel, one that had a weekly rate that averaged out to about $29 per night. It was the only thing we could afford and, even then, when I tried to check in one Sunday night there was not enough money in our account.<br />
<br />
However, one evening during the training, my wife called me and told me that my first column had run. It was about “The Starfish Poem,” and how every life mattered. I was so excited.<br />
<br />
Fifteen years have quickly passed and this is my 300th column for the local papers. It is also my final column.<br />
<br />
The time has come to move on — I feel like I have exhausted my perspectives. While there will always be specific issues to write about, my underlying values and arguments have been well communicated by now. I’ve learned to never say never, so I can’t say that I won’t ever write to or for the paper again, but it is my intention to tackle the next adventures in my life.<br />
<br />
My desire to write was inspired by Stephan Jay Gould, who wrote beautifully and intelligently for Natural History magazine. A collection of his essays was required reading in one of my biology classes. I fell in love with his knowledge and brilliance and was envious of his writing ability.<br />
<br />
I enjoy dissecting issues and writing challenged me to acquire some knowledge on an issue, consider both sides (or several sides) of an argument, and present a coherent essay on the subject. I tried to tackle the tough issues and in doing so I learned a lot about myself and what I was willing to share publicly.<br />
<br />
Writing this column has been a wonderful experience, which has allowed me to grow both personally and professionally. I appreciated all the feedback, positive and negative, and my only hope was that on occasion my views offered some reader reflection and consideration.<br />
<br />
I do have a couple of endeavors yet to consider. I want to write a book. I have been taking notes for over a decade but have never consistently committed the time it takes. The book will examine how — through “arrogance, ignorance and indifference” — we have become disconnected from the foundation of society. It will offer in-depth philosophical ideas intertwined with autobiographical experiences. I was making notes about societal fabrication and detachment long before “fake news” became a catchphrase.<br />
<br />
I would like to run for political office one day, to put into practice that which I am so passionate about. To test my political philosophies, perhaps.<br />
<br />
But I also turned 50 this year and I am acutely aware that there are no certainties in life. There is no longer the feeling of infinite summers, holidays, and time with my family. There is an anxiousness and awareness about time, and a bucket list that needs an increasing amount of attention.<br />
<br />
I am motivated by Sir Francis Bacon Sr., who wrote, “Begin doing what you want to do now. We are not living in eternity. We have only this moment, sparkling like a star in our hand and melting like a snowflake.”<br />
<br />
In 15 years, it is interesting to know that, as a freelancer writer and due to technology, I never once walked into the newspaper’s office. However, I am grateful to Kathleen Willbond, who invited me to start writing my column, and editor Jason Hawk for his opinions and guidance. I am also grateful for the publishers along the way who printed my columns, even if they were controversial or unpopular at times.<br />
<br />
Finally, I want to thank my friends and colleagues who often read and commented on my drafts, and my wonderful wife who not only proofread most of my columns but also provided honest feedback.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-70963057148729692142018-08-20T14:35:00.003-04:002018-08-20T14:40:11.809-04:00299. Ingredients for a perfect candidate<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
We often hear from voters that they are tired of politicians, particularly career politicians.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
There are a few reasons for this, ranging from the desire for some fresh ideas to the fear that longtime politicians get too cozy with special interest groups. Often, I hear that voters want “ordinary people” to represent them.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
When it comes to voting for political candidates, what are we really looking for?</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
I have a few ideas, but it is fair to note that these are just my thoughts and that there are many exceptions, both positive and negative:</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<ul>
<li>First is a diverse background. Government encompasses so many areas of business, law, science, engineering, human resources, accounting, and philosophy. Whether through education or experience, I think it is incredibly valuable to have several areas of expertise. Issues are complicated and often engage economic, legal, and moral considerations. So I am weary of a candidate who has done the same job for 30 years. They might be incredibly smart and driven; however, their skills and areas of expertise might be too narrow. For example, the candidate might be a great doctor, but do they have the experience or knowledge to consider issues regarding the environment, manufacturing, or economic development? Our elected officers should represent all member of their constituents — that includes black people, poor people, and service workers as well as rich people, small business owners, and political donors.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>I think it is optimal to have worked in both the private and public sector. The relationship between the two is an important one and best served by those who have considered the interests of both. This would also include experience with union workforces. Consider a successful businessperson. Whether it is a small business owner, for which voters often share affection, or a wealthy mogul, we have to remember that the primary interest and experience of that business owner is in the private sector.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Life experience is crucial and includes things like going to college, getting married, buying a house, and paying taxes. For that reason, I have concerns about young candidates. And it is not because they might not be brilliant and committed, but because, in my opinion, life experience matters. If a candidate has not spent time in “the real world” and done things like buying a house and paying property taxes, then I worry he or she won’t truly understand their constituents.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Leadership experience might include things like working with nonprofit organizations or serving on community boards. Leadership is a difficult quality and can be differentiated from advocacy and representation. One needs to understand the role government plays in each of the areas, such as the impact of raising taxes or applying for a grant. And, unfortunately, the truth is that some people are better in supportive roles. For example, in sports there are some outstanding assistant coaches who were awful head coaches.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Humility. Serving a community is a tremendous responsibility and public officials need to spend as much time listening as they do talking. The purpose of leadership is to improve the lives of the people in your community, not boost egos or practice narcissism. It is about spending time listening — really listening! — to constituents.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>You have to be someone who can overcome obstacles. I like a candidate who has overcome adversity at some point in their life. Life is difficult and at one time or another most people have faced some difficult situations. I would rather have someone who took college courses in the evening, overcame financial challenges, or worked two jobs to provide for his or her family, than those who had their college paid for, a job waiting for them at Dad’s firm when they graduated, and a trust fund to buy their house.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>I like people who “learned their politics.” What I mean is that they identified their political philosophies from their experiences, not simply adopted the platform of a political party. They’ve been downsized from a job or worked with immigrants. They have spent more time in the community, helping people without an agenda, than attending political fundraisers. They offer specifics on how to help the community rather than adopt slogans like, “I am going to be a crusader for the working man!” Say how you will help the working man!</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Serving the public is a difficult job that can affect the lives of millions of people. Politicians need to be smart and informed and understand how one issue or interest may affect another. For example, placing a tariff on steel sounds great and rallies the out-of-work steelworkers; however, just that simple action, fair or not, has had a ripple effect throughout the world impacting workers and other industries.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Unfortunately, in my opinion, Americans don’t take voting seriously enough. They don’t learn about the candidates and issues, don’t verify the statements of candidates and special interest groups, and too often lazily re-elect incumbents.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
It takes effort and defining your own list of criteria. What are you looking for in a candidate?</div>
Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-3371980181154914422018-08-06T21:34:00.003-04:002023-07-02T10:05:41.389-04:00298. Picking and choosing customers <div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
A sign in the bakery window could have read: </div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
“Heterosexuals only.”</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
Or maybe these might one day be more appropriate:</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
“Heterosexual Christians only.”</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
“Heterosexual Roman Catholic Christians only.”</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
“Heterosexual White Roman Catholic Christians only.”</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
I have wanted to write about this case for a while and the recent Supreme Court decision regarding the baker who, for religious reasons, refused to bake a custom cake for a homosexual couple, provides that opportunity.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
The same-sex couple argued that Colorado law prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
The Supreme Court ruled for the baker; however, its decision was a narrow one, meaning that it only looked at a sliver of the laws that may eventually be affected. Although those on the right celebrated, the real issue is forthcoming, which Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote about in the majority opinion: “… these disputes must be resolved with tolerance, without undue disrespect to sincere religious beliefs, and without subjecting gay persons to indignities when they seek goods and services in an open market.”</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
This issue affects the rights of private businesses to choose their customers. Usually, they can do so uninhibitedly, except when the party is a member of a protected class. Choosing not to serve someone because he or she is wearing a LeBron James jersey is OK but choosing not to serve someone because he or she is black is not.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
Classes based on gender, race, age, or sexual orientation, for example, are protected for two reasons: One, they are viewed as things that people can’t control, and two they are classes that have been frequently discriminated against in the history of this country — often harshly. The trump card, and also a protected class due to previous abuses, is religion, which unfortunately means people can claim almost anything as a “religious belief.”</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
Of course, it’s generally not good business to start chasing your customers away. But there is the question about the duty to our beliefs and values. If I owned a business, there are certainly people I would be uncomfortable serving. I don’t want the money from people who might hurt children or animals, for example.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
Let’s turn this around. Suppose there were two Italian restaurants side by side and, feeling like pizza today, I had to choose. Generally, I like them both but one has a big “NRA for Trump” sign in the window and the other one has a “Health Care for All” sign in the other. Which one am going to choose?</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
A couple of years ago, when I was looking for a concrete company, I was not too excited when one of the business owners started talking about all the deer he kills. Why do I want to give him my money to support this hobby? Conversely, my neighbor advertised for a Christian landscaper — presumably because he wants to give his money to people who believe as he does.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
Truthfully, when it comes to choosing a business, I would rather not know their political or religious beliefs. If I do, then undoubtedly it is going to factor in my decision. Similarly, businesses probably don’t want to know everything about their customers. Are you going to serve those engaged in domestic violence? What about those who kill animals for fun, drive drunk, or are too lazy to recycle? Like the opening paragraphs of this column, that customer list could narrow quickly.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
This is a complicated issue. Do I bake cakes or do I only bake cakes for people who share my vision of society? Generally, I have a hard time faulting people who are true to their beliefs and principles. I would not want to bake a cake for a hunting festival or deliver one to a pig roast. Let someone else do it.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
The challenge of course, especially when it comes to religion, is hypocrisy. I don’t know the extent of the baker’s faith, but I would ask — does he serve divorced customers, those who have committed adultery, or those who have stolen? Again, ignorance may apply, but before one discriminates based on religion, I would hope for a consistent application of those beliefs (the courts will test that).</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
For me, this issue presents more questions than answers. Because we do not truly know the motives or the authenticity of one’s beliefs, I believe that businesses should be able to choose their customers (at their own peril) and protected classes should continue to be legally free of discrimination.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">The problem, as this case demonstrates, is when two protected classes meet.</div>
Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-51306045219497032452018-08-05T14:05:00.001-04:002018-08-05T14:05:22.866-04:00297. What's the point of the game?<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
A Ponzi scheme needs two actors — a fraudulent businessman or woman who promises high returns for investments into his or her company, and an investor who has been sold the promise of higher than normal (or guaranteed) returns.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
Typically, when the money is withdrawn, the early investors receive their high-return money, sparking more investors, while those later investors, as the money runs out or the fraud scheme is exposed, can lose almost everything.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
For most, money serves a few purposes. First and foremost, it is a necessity to purchase the essentials of living, such as shelter, food, and clothing. Money also provides security in anticipation of both short- and long-term financial needs, whether it’s surviving a job loss or later being able to retire. Next are the desires — those things we want but neither provide our essentials or security for the future. Socio-economic groups might have differing opinions on the distinction between needs and desires. For some, a television is a desire, for others it is a million-dollar yacht. Regardless, desires are generally regarded as those possessions or services that exceed the necessities of survival.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
Finally, there is the money that provides freedom in life. There is another name for it, one that Matt Damon made famous in “Promised Land.” It is the money that comes after the necessities, security, and desires. It is the money that lets you navigate the rest of your life freely. It is the money that lets you quit your job or retire early. It is free of debt or obligation and enough money to do whatever you want for the rest of your life (of course, the less desires, the quicker the freedom).</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
I think the true winners of our current economic system are those who earn (or inherit, I suppose) their freedom. The game, I think, is to win as young as possible. The younger that you can live your life, the more life you will have to live. The number, of course, is different for everyone and how they live. The money to live quietly on a small farm is less than perhaps for someone who wants to travel the world. Some would like their money to run out at the very moment of their death; others want to leave money to family members or causes they believe in. It’s unpredictable but the point is clear.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
Once you have freedom money, by definition, you don’t need any more. You don’t need to work for it, you don’t have to invest it — you’re done. You have enough to live the rest of your life, so why take risks?</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
And yet.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
We see people who have enough money to last the rest of their lives continue to work, to make business deals, to invest it. Some just can’t stop, it is in their nature; some are just incredibly greedy. Some are talked into risky investments, whether it is in the stock market or opening a restaurant. Certainly, some have insatiable desires. It is not unusual to see athletes, movie stars, and successful business people have enough money for generations but lose it all.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
This takes me back to the victims of Ponzi schemes. The stories are, on the one hand, heartbreaking, such as hearing about a couple who worked all their lives and saved up a couple million dollars that would easily provide for their retirement, only to lose it all by being conned into a Ponzi scheme.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
But on the other hand, I am furious with these people. They are baited by the desire for more money, to earn an unrealistic return on their money. And they don’t just invest it, they invest it all. What is it about human nature that people would risk their freedom money to earn a higher return on money they don’t even need?</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
Unfortunately, our world is defined in many respects by money. It is an obsessive desire to have more and more — just for the game of it, to impress friends, or as a scorecard on success. It’s like sitting down at McDonald’s for lunch with 64 Big Macs — what are you going to do with 63 of those Big Macs? Invest them to earn 82 Big Macs?</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
I think, in a lot of ways, people have forgotten the purpose of money. And for most Americans, our financial journeys are tough enough — we make mistakes, we don’t save enough, we don’t set financial goals. It is too easy to buy things we can’t afford. Most of us have fallen into financial traps. It’s hard to reach “freedom” financial status but it is even harder when we are not aware of that which it really offers.</div>
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
If you get there, enjoy it. You’re free to do what you want, when you want! If your work brings you pleasure, work without the worry of losing your job. Or maybe travel, volunteer, or spend time with friends or family. Or maybe sit peacefully on your porch with your dog, listening to the birds. Or spend your time in a garden growing big, beautiful tomatoes.</div>
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; text-shadow: none;">
</span><br />
<div style="background-attachment: scroll; background-clip: border-box; background-image: none; background-origin: padding-box; background-position: 0% 0%; background-repeat: repeat; background-size: auto; border: 0px none rgb(68, 68, 68); color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; margin-bottom: 21px; orphans: 4; outline-style: none; outline-width: 0px; padding: 0px; text-shadow: none; vertical-align: baseline;">
It’s your life. Just don’t risk it — never invest it all, never seek suspiciously high returns, don’t open an expensive business. We work to earn the money we need to buy our freedom — don’t be tempted to jeopardize it for money you don’t need.</div>
Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-85193384576421196262018-07-12T20:31:00.003-04:002018-07-12T20:31:31.572-04:00296. Abandoned again, naturally <div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Probably the last thing people living in Northeast Ohio want to read is another opinion about LeBron James leaving the Cleveland Cavaliers again.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
There is a glut of sportswriters and talk shows that have been debating this all season, with mostly unoriginal and recycled thoughts. For that I apologize — but I find the range of opinions to be fascinating. Some think LeBron did what he came to Cleveland to do, so there are no hard feelings, while others (maybe not to the jersey-burning extreme like last time) still feel slighted by his decision.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
I have mixed feelings. LeBron did come back home and win a championship, ending an agonizing 52-year pursuit for the city. James is a hard-worker, stays out of trouble, and gives back tremendously to the community. At the same time, it is hard not to question his motive: Did he come to Cleveland to win a championship, or to preserve his legacy — one seemingly forever tarnished in “The Decision”? Did he evaluate the roster and know with Kyrie Irving and Kevin Love they had a competitive team right away?</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
What bothers me is his letter to the city when he came back. He made us feel proud. He raised our spirits. I remember just feeling so content that he tried to make things right.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
However, some of James’ words now disappoint me.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
“My relationship with Northeast Ohio is bigger than basketball. I didn’t realize it four years ago. I do now,” he began. And so, four years later, where is that relationship? In Los Angeles?</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
“I always believed I’d return to Cleveland and finish my career there. I just didn’t know when,” he said. Finish his career in Cleveland? Is he coming back again?</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
“Of course, I want to win next year, but I am realistic. It will be a long process,” he said. It wasn’t long process, and I don’t think he ever believed that — he was just taking some of the pressure off himself. But obviously he no longer seems committed to the process in Cleveland, even with an owner who will spend freely. He delivered his championship and feels “allowed” to leave.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
“I feel my calling here goes above basketball. I want kids in Northeast Ohio… to realize there is no better place to grow up,” he said. LeBron loves it so much, he and his family left again. Now LeBron’s kids will grow up in Los Angeles.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
And most famously he wrote, “In Northeast Ohio, nothing is given. Everything is earned.” Now it seems that he gave himself a new team — giving up on the one in Northeast Ohio.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
I am not a fan of the NBA as much as I am a fan of Cleveland. I think the game is nearly impossible to referee consistently, the regular season is meaningless, and the playoffs take too long. And if LeBron didn’t ruin it when he went to Miami with his buddies to win a championship, Kevin Durant ruined it when he joined a Golden State team that went an NBA record 73-9 the prior season. I never say his name without mentioning what a coward he was to join that team.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
For those of us who grew up with the likes of Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, Michael Jordan, Julius Erving, and Isiah Thomas, who played most of their careers with one team, its hard to understand the modern players. It’s all immediate gratification and not much fun for the fans.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
And so everyone is chasing a ridiculous obstacle in Golden State. I don’t understand how the other teams in the league survive when the players have made a concerted effort to put together a few super teams. As I am writing this, DeMarcus Cousins reportedly just signed with Golden State, giving them, if healthy, an all-star at every position.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Meanwhile, LeBron again leaves the team in Cleveland in ruins. He chased off their next best player in Kyrie Irving. His presence created an urgency to win now (since he wouldn’t sign a long-term deal in Cleveland), which initiated many bad contracts the Cavaliers are now left holding. They will, like last time, be terrible for some time.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Cleveland will retire LeBron’s number one day, and they should. As for a statue? For a player who twice left the city to he proclaimed to love and only delivered one championship in 11 seasons, I’d have a hard time warming up to the idea.</div>
Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-29415961142681048842018-07-08T07:33:00.004-04:002018-07-08T07:33:41.016-04:00295. Of puffins and inner pieceSitting on Hog Island overlooking Muscongus Bay off the coast of Bremen, Maine, an American goldfinch sang beautifully as I was rereading Henry David Thoreau’s epic novel, “Walden Pond.” For the soul, the combination was almost unfair.<br />
<br />
Thanks to a scholarship from the Black River Audubon Society, I spent a week attending the Audubon Field Ornithology Camp, which is home to the Puffin Project. We rose at dawn, usually around 4:30 a.m., and slept with the sun, just before 9 p.m.<br />
<br />
There was no television and no radio, which also meant no politics, not a single mention the entire week (except in reference to the administration’s attack on the Migratory Bird Treaty Act), and no other social nuisances like LeBron James’ free agency. It was bird lovers coming together to share nature — to learn about the evolution and ecology of birds, share conversations about their behaviors, and see them in their natural habitats. It also included difficult looks at the impact of humans on the planet and avian environments, as well as our role in protecting some species over others.<br />
<br />
The week included field trips to local parks and reservations, educational workshops, healthy “family style” meals (you know, the kind that includes engaging conversation), and programs presented by acclaimed scientists and writers from across the country on bird ecology. It also included boat trips throughout Muscongus Bay, an area rich with small islands and home to many shorebird habitats.<br />
<br />
The highlight of the camp was the trip to Eastern Egg Rock, home of Atlantic puffins. I could barely control my excitement as our boat approached. Not usually fond of boats (and generally terrified of open waters), the three- to five-foot waves and rocking of our boat could not diffuse my enthusiasm. I battled my fear and balance to get a look at the puffins and other birds, such as black guillemots, terns, razorbills, double-crested cormorants, and gulls. I even got a few photos.<br />
<br />
The story of puffins in Maine and Eastern Egg Rock is a long and detailed one, but Audubon summarizes it this way: “Project Puffin began with an attempt to restore puffins to Eastern Egg Rock in Muscongus Bay, about six miles east of Pemaquid Point. Puffins had nested there until about 1885 when hunters took the last survivors of this once-flourishing colony. The restoration of puffins to Eastern Egg Rock is based on the fact that young puffins usually return to breed on the same island where they hatched.”<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgozgS3pypqrlVdezU3dVKUzOXaNmGyjpIsf6lEbHhnDA_jVJNjeVBZxnlUaw7_-2mVmP8PRBmGoYoKhKc3DQDtTCEhZUNKR0V6kV-mUCZXwBKd_onQ_XOBs1HIFMP0KeVdjblE4ciHttN3/s1600/puffin+flying+2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1143" data-original-width="1600" height="228" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgozgS3pypqrlVdezU3dVKUzOXaNmGyjpIsf6lEbHhnDA_jVJNjeVBZxnlUaw7_-2mVmP8PRBmGoYoKhKc3DQDtTCEhZUNKR0V6kV-mUCZXwBKd_onQ_XOBs1HIFMP0KeVdjblE4ciHttN3/s320/puffin+flying+2.jpg" width="320" /></a>To do this took ingenuity and patience (puffins only lay one egg per year) but the success not only restored puffin populations to the coast of Maine, it became a model for restoring other bird populations across the world.<br />
<br />
“Between 1973 and 1986, 954 young puffins were transplanted from Great Island to Eastern Egg Rock and 914 of these successfully fledged. Transplanted puffins began returning to Eastern Egg Rock in June of 1977. To lure them ashore and encourage the birds to explore nesting habitat, wooden puffin decoys were positioned atop large boulders. These were readily visited by the curious young birds, which often sat with the models and pecked at their stiff wooden beaks. The number of young puffins slowly increased. In 1981, four pairs nested beneath boulders at the edge of the island. The colony has since increased to 150 pairs.”<br />
<br />
In 2017, the project reported 172 pairs.<br />
<br />
The project has not only been successful for the puffins, it has led to research opportunities for young scientists. Each summer about 15 interns live on the recluse island, spending quiet days in blinds and reporting on puffin and other bird activity.<br />
<br />
While I fell in love with the success of the puffin project, we quickly learned that each species has its own story — both successes and challenges. Populations are often fragile and can quickly change due to factors such as predation, environmental changes (warmer water, for example), available food, and availability of habitats. Nature is difficult and many stories are difficult to hear.<br />
<br />
Thoreau’s book is based on his time living in a small self-built cabin near Walden Pond, which he committed to live as simply as possible as a way to understand life. “I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived.”<br />
<br />
I also reflect that too many people are going to miss “the good stuff” in life. The good stuff, in my opinion, is experiencing life — not only in practice, but also in emotion, thought, and understanding. The “bad stuff” is the restless pursuit of money and the practice of greed and materialism. It is living the “scripted life,” doing that of which is expected, only to wake up one day, old and unfulfilled.<br />
<br />
Thoreau wrote, “Do not trouble yourself much to get new things, whether clothes or friends. Turn the old; return to them. Things do not change; we change. Sell your clothes and keep your thought … Superfluous wealth can buy superfluities only. Money is not required to buy one necessary of the soul.”<br />
<br />
Maybe we need to return to calm and peace of nature. Spend more time enjoying the views of lakes, the soothing motion of waves, the swaying of trees, and the songs of birds. A place of tranquility, alone comfortably alone with our just thoughts and appreciation of the natural world around us.<br />
<br />
A place that money can’t buy.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-33365106733965048632018-06-10T22:16:00.001-04:002018-06-10T22:16:19.883-04:00294. The two-party system is killing usIndividuals have a diversity of religious beliefs, moral values, and cultural traditions.<br />
<br />
Beliefs, values, and traditions affect opinions on areas of life such as liberty, justice, government, democracy, social welfare, war, economics, and on and on. These social perspectives are often grouped into political categories such as liberal, conservative, Tea Party, Occupy Wall Street, socialist, and moderate. From simple exponential functions, it is easy to consider how many different social and political perspective combinations there may be in this country.<br />
<br />
Yet Americans are expected to funnel themselves into the two great parties — Democrats and Republicans. If you are for one, you are against the other. And while there are other parties, such as Libertarian and the Green Party, none have risen to the level that even allows them to get invited to a presidential debate.<br />
<br />
I often say that I am a liberal whose values most closely align with the Democratic Party, but it doesn’t mean that all my values, without distinction, line up perfectly with the Democratic platform. I have some conservative values (mostly fiscal), some libertarian leanings on freedoms, and I support many democratic-socialist perspectives. And while I adamantly oppose some Republican values (and our president), it doesn’t mean there are not some gray areas. For example, I am for the death penalty if there is absolutely no uncertainly as to the nature of the crime (such as caught on video). I am for social welfare programs but I don’t think people should abuse the system to get a free ride. Social issues are difficult and form a continuum of issues and situations.<br />
<br />
The impression that everyone should have to “pick a side” and turn our democracy into to an “us versus them” ideology has always been concerning to me. This has led to a highly contentious and aggressive political divide that has limited fair and intelligent discussions, incited a winner-take-all mentality, and hindered open-minded compromise.<br />
<br />
One founding father warned of this divide. John Adams prophetically said, “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.”<br />
<br />
George Washington also expressed his concern in his farewell presidential address: “The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.”<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, modern times are bringing these concerns to fruition. The animosity of the parties and their constituents and the “alternate domination” of the parties has sharpened the spirit of revenge.<br />
<br />
Since so many important congressional votes are cast along party lines and there is the increasing use of executive action, we are experiencing a back-and-forth in which laws are being formed and repealed or reversed as soon as the other party regains control. It’s highly inefficient, sponsors bitterness, and repels progress.<br />
<br />
Michael Coblenz of The Hill wrote, “The two-party system is destroying America. Democrats and Republicans are in a death match and the American people are caught in the middle. The nation faces all sorts of serious problems, from growing inequality to spreading international terrorism, but the bitter fight between Democrats and Republicans has largely ground government to a halt. Partisans on both sides are so angry they can barely speak with the other, much less work together.”<br />
<br />
Exactly — and lost in this battle are the American people. Politicians are representatives of their constituents and should act in their interest, not the exclusive interest of the party. People are tired of the “party over country” politics.<br />
<br />
Of further concern is that of the controlling party changing the rules to increase its power. Coblenz further commented, “Each side is more extreme, and each bases their political agenda on demonizing the other side. Each side engages in political machinations, which include partisan gerrymandering and manipulating the rules of Congress to get their way, stymie their opponents, or deny them office completely.”<br />
<br />
The Republican blocking of Merrick Garland, President Barack Obama’s nominee for the Supreme Court, in early 2016 is the most egregious example.<br />
<br />
A multiparty system might infuse new ideas and inspire diversity and compromise. Politicians should be able to vote according to their ideologies and the interest of their constituents without the fear of party retribution. There might be occasions in which, for example, religious conservatives may work with liberals on health care. Or the Tea Party with conservative Democrats on fiscal responsibility. If nothing else, it would help parties alleviate the consistent hypocrisy they exhibit.<br />
<br />
In my opinion, and although I won’t live to see it, it’s time for the American two-party system to evolve into a political system that represents the diverse “melting pot” that makes up our country — one that is diverse in not just demographics, but also beliefs, morals, and traditions.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-20073907407207706802018-05-30T22:14:00.000-04:002018-06-10T22:15:31.650-04:00293. Amazing birds need our protections<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
One of the most fragile animal classes on the planet are migratory birds.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
These amazing birds maintain winter and breeding homes and travel thousands of miles per year, relying on sustainable food, water, and habitats along the way. The remarkable journey and life cycle incorporates more than the normal amount of risk as birds are highly evolved and often very specific in their adaptions.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Some interesting migration facts provided by the Audubon Society:</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
</div>
<ul>
<li>The Arctic tern has the longest migration of any bird, almost 50,000 miles in one year, going from the Arctic to Antarctica.</li>
<li>Some migrating birds fly as high as five and half miles above sea level. The record is a Ruppell’s griffon vulture, which traveled seven miles above sea level.</li>
<li>The northern wheatear, weighing less than one ounce, travels from the Arctic to Africa — almost 9,000 miles each way.</li>
<li>The fastest migratory bird, traveling 60 miles per hour, is the great snipe.</li>
<li>The bar-tailed godwit can make the nearly 7,000-mile trip without stopping.</li>
<li>Migratory birds enter a physical state called hyperphagia before traveling, bulking up on fat to fuel the trip.</li>
</ul>
<br />
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Obviously, any trip of this magnitude is quite dangerous and billions of birds die each year from a variety of causes. Windows, radio and television towers, cars, and windmills all cause the death of these brave migrants. Other human activities threatening bird species are hunting, habitat fragmentation, and domestic cats.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
It’s due to the hunting and habitat destruction that birds are among the most protected animals. And, as with any environmental issue, it can be quite contentious, as many people put the interest of industry, sport, trade, and economic development above the needs of birds.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The Migratory Bird Treaty was born, in part, out of the overhunting and annihilation of birds like the passenger pigeon. Once abundant, it was hunted to extinction despite the attempt of activists.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
All About Birds provided this account of the failure of an 1857 Ohio Senate committee to protect the passenger pigeon: “The passenger pigeon needs no protection. Wonderfully prolific, having the vast forests of the North as its breeding grounds, traveling hundreds of miles in search of food, it is here today and elsewhere tomorrow, and no ordinary destruction can lessen them, or be missed from the myriads that are yearly produced.”</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
According to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, “The MBTA provides that it is unlawful to pursue, hunt, take, capture, kill, possess, sell, purchase, barter, import, export, or transport any migratory bird, or any part, nest, or egg or any such bird, unless authorized under a permit issued by the Secretary of the Interior. Some regulatory exceptions apply. Take is defined in regulations as: ‘pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or attempt to pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect.’”</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
This basically means you have to leave birds alone. You can’t kill, hunt, or trap them for fun or because they are a nuisance. You can’t destroy their nests or collect their eggs. You can’t catch them and sell them or their feathers. There is an exhaustive list of migratory birds, including common birds like the Canada goose. They might be messy and abundant but they are protected by federal law.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The MBT has been credited with saving the snowy egret, which was hunted for it delicate feathers, and many other birds such as the wood duck and sandhill crane.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
However, in the Trump administration’s continued effort to destroy anything that gets in the way of financial interests, enforcement of the MBT has been changed to accommodate industry that may “incidentally” kill birds. A Washington Post report said the greatest beneficiaries of the change are oil and gas companies, which “were responsible for 90 percent of incidental takes prosecuted under the act, resulting in fines of $6,500 per violation.” Newsweek noted that “environmental disasters still carry legal ramifications, but the MBTA will no longer have the power to prosecute actions that incidentally harm birds.”</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Birds provide numerous benefits to our ecosystems. They eat insects, clean up road kill and dead fish, and distribute seeds. They are also a sign of ecological health.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
And bird-watching is one of the most popular hobbies. They are fascinating to watch and learn about — they all seem to have different story. They also provide tremendous economic support to places like Magee Marsh, where thousands of birders come from all across the world to see dazzling warblers make their final stop before crossing Lake Erie.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
They are worth protecting and with hundreds of bird species on the endangered list — it might be now or never.</div>
Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-28572266562733890152018-05-23T22:15:00.000-04:002018-06-10T22:15:09.313-04:00292. Baseball and the world have changedBaseball has been a big part of my life. When I was young and playing in youth leagues, I would go in my room and cry when games where rained out. I carried this passion from my youth through high school, college, and adult leagues.<br />
<br />
While of course I wanted to play professional baseball, my goal was to play college baseball and I was fortunate to receive a scholarship to play at Ashland University.<br />
<br />
After college, it was hard to give it up. Most guys fade away to start their careers, attend graduate school, or raise families. But I was lucky to play into my mid-30s and I also coached at several area high schools. Baseball was in my blood.<br />
<br />
The Cleveland Indians’ remarkable run in the mid-90s was enjoyed with my wife, whom I started dating in 1995. We spent many nights at Jacob’s Field watching incredible Tribe comebacks. We also traveled to some away games with friends to root for the team.<br />
<br />
I always pictured myself buying season tickets to Indians games after I retired. I would live out my days at the stadium eating hot dogs and watching the game I loved.<br />
<br />
However, like so many things, the game has changed.<br />
<br />
The analytics and subsequent approach to the game has transformed it and fans have noticed. Major League Baseball has noticed the declining attendance and is trying to make changes to improve the fan experience.<br />
<br />
The game increasingly relies on the home run to produce runs, as hitters have adjusted their “launch angle.” In 2014, the percentage of runs via the home run was 33 percent; in 2016 it was 40 percent.<br />
<br />
Swinging for the fences has also led to the more strikeouts, which have increased 10 straight years. The obsession with home runs has also led to defensive shifts, which places extra fielders on the “pull” side of the field. In 1993, Frank Thomas, swinging down through the ball and hitting to all fields, hit 41 home runs and stuck out 54 times. In 2017, Joey Gallo hit 41 home runs and struck out 196 times.<br />
<br />
Watching the Indians and Yankees in the playoffs last year was miserable. The Yankees struck out 64 times in the five-game series, almost 13 per game. The Indians struck out 61 times.<br />
<br />
Stolen bases are down, bunts are down, and I can’t remember the last time I saw a well-executed hit and run. Many players no longer even own these skills, as evidenced by an entire side of the infield left unattended. Managers and players don’t want to “waste an out” and thereby reduce the number of attempts to hit the ball out of the park.<br />
<br />
The number of pitching changes has slowed the game down to the point that baseball has limited the number of trips to the mound. And the lack of offensive creativity has limited the game management to pitching and batter match-ups. Speaking of game management (in the National League), it’s time to choose between a designated hitter and the pitcher batting. Inter-league play should encourage that the leagues share the same set of rules.<br />
<br />
I thought I would be a fan of instant replay in baseball. However, like football, it has created a delayed reaction to close plays. Managers must get a signal from their staff to challenge the call and then the umpires must look at it. The spirit of replay was never to punish baserunners who come off the base an inch or two — but a rule is a rule. And while replay is important for game-changing plays, the calling of balls and strikes is a critical part of the game and the umpires’ ability to do this varies greatly.<br />
<br />
The major league playoff system, which was smart to introduce a wild card team in 1994, ruined it in 2012 when two wild card teams from each league qualified and now battle in a ridiculous one game playoff. When you need 162 games to determine playoff teams, you need a seven-game playoffs series — even the five-game series is not statistically long enough.<br />
<br />
And finally, postseason baseball (to the Indians’ benefit in 2016) is a different game than the regular season — it’s long and disjointed.<br />
<br />
But it not just the game that has changed. The world has changed.<br />
<br />
The slow play of baseball (compared to other major sports) lends itself to the distraction of cell phones. When I do get to a game, it is hard to understand the number of people who spend more time watching their phones than watching the game.<br />
<br />
Finally, when I was younger, it never bothered me that athletes made the money they did (and back then they didn’t make anything like they make now). Although baseball is probably the most affordable of the major professional sports, it’s gotten ridiculous and many hard-working people aren’t willing to pay that kind of money to attend a game. And the player excuse of, “I have to the think of my family,” when choosing between a $100 million contract and a $95 million contract is a little out of touch.<br />
<br />
I grew up in North Eaton, and I was there a couple of weeks ago looking for birds. I told my wife it reminded me of the days I spent there playing baseball. There was something in the air, the smell of rural spring evenings, and the threat of rain, that took me back to the simplicity of my hopes and dreams.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, things change.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-57723452140666711352018-05-16T22:11:00.000-04:002018-06-10T22:12:14.989-04:00291. You have to consider lost opportunitiesOpportunity cost is largely a business term describing the impact of a decision to produce one product over another or invest in one company over another.<br />
<br />
“Opportunity cost refers to a benefit that a person could have received, but gave up, to take another course of action,” Investopedia describes it. “Stated differently, an opportunity cost represents an alternative given up when a decision is made. This cost is, therefore, most relevant for two mutually exclusive events.”<br />
<br />
The last sentence is the key to understanding opportunity costs — it is the decision that comes at the expense of every other mutually exclusive choice.<br />
<br />
It is a relevant and sometimes overwhelming concept that applies to not just financial matters but many other elements of our lives.<br />
<br />
For example, if I go to law school, it comes (most likely) at the time and financial expense of going to medical school, bartending school or studying to be an architect. But it also applies to simple matters like what to do on Sunday mornings when you cannot be in two places at the same time. Going to Cedar Point comes at the expense of everything else you could do on that particular morning, such as go to church, have brunch with the family, or fly to Rome.<br />
<br />
In terms of personal finance, some advisors have suggested that it is one of the most overlooked considerations of decision-making.<br />
<br />
If I decide to buy a boat, I have to consider not just whether or not I can I afford to buy the boat but whether I should purchase the boat at the expense of everything else I could buy with that money. Should I buy the boat or a car? Or should I take 10 vacations or go out to dinner 500 times?<br />
<br />
Too often we want it all and don’t think about how one thing affects the other — we just do it and hope to figure it out later. It’s the danger of credit cards — that which allows us to delay or spread out opportunity costs by not paying only what we can afford at a given point in time.<br />
<br />
This distinction lends itself well to the discussion of local and national budgets. Whereas state and local governments have to balance budgets, the federal government, as we all know, can run trillions of dollars in debt.<br />
<br />
Local governments, with a finite amount of projected revenue, have to make difficult decisions. Officials have to choose between adding another police officer, fixing up a city park, repairing a road, or buying a fire truck. For the most part, it is a good requirement as it attempts to prevent local governments from going into debt. The trade-off, of course, is that poorer communities — those that collect less in tax revenue — often see their services decline. There might be fewer police officers on the roads to keep the community safe or it might take longer for roads to be repaired.<br />
<br />
Conversely, the federal government can fall in debt — currently to the tune of $21 trillion, according to the U.S. debt clock. That works out to almost $175,000 per American taxpayer. Of course, the federal government can also sell bonds or obtain loans from foreign governments. It’s a complicated financial system but the point is: opportunity costs.<br />
<br />
Federal opportunity costs are limited more by political consequences than actual budgetary restrictions. For example, imagine if you went to the polls in November to vote on the budget and the questions read as an opportunity cost. You’d have to choose between a border wall, improved infrastructure, larger military, or an to end homelessness.<br />
<br />
When the government (or individuals) can borrow money, it negates the value of considering opportunity costs in decision-making.<br />
<br />
However, as I mentioned, it can be an overwhelming, even paralyzing, concept in terms of time and money. It can be exhausting to consider that you are spending your money at the “expense” of everything else you could buy or spending your time at the “expense” of everything you could be doing.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-44368405561145949682018-05-09T22:10:00.000-04:002018-06-10T22:11:02.908-04:00290. Pruitt doesn't belong at EPADespite promising to hire the best people, President Donald Trump’s administration has been a revolving door with Trump hiring them and then firing them in often rapid and dramatic fashion. He pledged to “drain the swamp,” but I am not sure he planned on stocking the swamp as well.<br />
<br />
One slime-covered gator still swimming in the metaphorical political swamp is Environmental Protection Agency administrator Scott Pruitt.<br />
<br />
Pruitt is, in fact, an enemy of the EPA, describing himself as a “leading advocate against the EPA’s activist agenda.” Putting him in charge of the EPA would be like putting a trophy hunter in charge of PETA. Pruitt, of course, doesn’t “believe” in climate change, to the degree that all references to climate change were removed from the agency website. The White House and EPA have sought to reverse as many as 67 environmental rules, according to the Harvard Law School’s Environmental Regulation Rollback Tracker and reported in the New York Times. Some include reversing migratory bird protections, endangered species listings, and the anti-dumping rule for coal companies. That 52 Republicans confirmed him in the Senate is embarrassing. His relationship with fossil fuel companies was apparently too lucrative to pass up.<br />
<br />
It’s quickly becoming the Environmental Destruction Agency.<br />
<br />
But it’s not just his environmental record, it’s also his ethics — or lack of them. Like his boss, he seems to have little regard for taxpayer money or conflicts of interest. He has allegedly rented a condo for $50 a night in Washington, D.C., from a lobbyist and purchased a $43,000 soundproof phone booth.<br />
<br />
The Office of Government Ethics has also questioned his frequent and sometimes first-class travel, raises given to some employees, and demotion of employees who questioned his spending. Acting director David Apol wrote, “If true, it is hard to imagine any action that could more effectively undermine an agency’s integrity than punishing or marginalizing employees who strive to ensure compliance with the laws and regulations that safeguard that integrity.”<br />
<br />
Tammy Duckworth (D-Illinois) said, “He’s the subject of no less than five independent investigations, he has retaliated against EPA staff who have questioned his spending habits, and he likely violated ethics rules by renting an apartment from an industry lobbyist.”<br />
<br />
But it is not just environmentalists and Democrats who want to see Pruitt fired. Many Republicans have had enough, including, according to a Wall Street Journal report, White House Chief of Staff John Kelly.<br />
<br />
The Hill reported this spring that “Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Florida) appear(s) to be the first Republican lawmaker to publicly request Pruitt’s dismissal. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Florida) echoed his call shortly after. In a Tuesday afternoon tweet, Curbello said Pruitt’s ‘corruption scandals are an embarrassment to the administration, and his conduct is grossly disrespectful to American taxpayers.’”<br />
<br />
Thus far, Pruitt has Trump’s support. In light of the turnover in the Trump administration, it is both mystifying and unfathomable that this is the guy that Trump stands with. Then again, ethics have never been anything that Trump has seemed to care much about — unless he was trying to impose them on President Barack Obama.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-43413773856119620282018-04-15T14:56:00.001-04:002018-06-10T22:19:24.752-04:00289. Orangutans deserve so much betterOrangutans are endangered primates, consisting of three species that only live in two places — the rainforests of Borneo and Sumatra.<br />
<br />
They are very intelligent and second only to chimpanzees in relation to human beings, matching 97 percent of our DNA. Orangutans are not as social as other animals — they are mostly loners, sleeping in amazing nests they build in trees each night. Dedicated female orangutans carry the responsibility of caring and protecting their young. Reproduction is slow, with females conceiving only about every eight years. Populations have dwindled due to the usual human activity: hunting, habitat destruction, and the pet trade.<br />
<br />
As one might imagine, baby orangutans are adorable! They have big eyes and goofy red hair. They use their long arms to cling to their mothers as they learn their way around the rainforest. The problem is that they are so adorable that some people want to keep them as pets.<br />
<br />
We live in a world in which people will do almost anything to make a few dollars. It’s a constant battle of good versus evil. It’s a battle between those who are willing to abuse and exploit other people, animals, or the environment for personal gain and those who are left to deal with the consequences of their actions. Loving and caring people donate time and money to help those in need, create regulations, and enforce laws.<br />
<br />
For every person who throws a tire in the river, there is a group of people who give up their Saturday to fetch it out. For every animal that is rescued from an abuser, there are compassionate people who rehab and care for the animal. For every company that exploits its workers or the poor, there are agencies dedicated to holding them accountable and offering assistance those in need.<br />
<br />
It’s exhausting. And it’s unfair that so many people have to spend their lives fighting the digressions of others.<br />
<br />
The list of consequences is tragic: Poverty, lack of clean water, slavery, extinction, unemployment, climate change, pollution, child labor, animal cruelty, physical pain, lost homes, mental anguish, bankruptcy — and I’m just getting started.<br />
<br />
The illegal pet trade is a billion-dollar activity and baby orangutans are often sold for a few hundred dollars to wealthy families and other cultures. Horrifically, the only way to really get a baby orangutan is to kill the mother and pry it from her dead hands.<br />
<br />
Baby orangutans feed from the mother up to six years of age, so it is no surprise that many die in transportation from the poacher to the buyer. The baby orangutans are not just orphaned from their mothers, they are taken from their habitat and are now at the mercy of the human beings who view them not as animals, not as primate cousins, but as dollar signs.<br />
<br />
It is an amazing sight to see baby orangutans sitting in wheelbarrows, one on top of another. Many have been seized from poachers and those who purchased them illegally. While rescued, the lifelong consequence is that they will grow up without their mother in a rehab center. It will cost hundreds of thousands of dollars (from taxpayers and personal donations) to care for these orphaned orangutans — to clean up the mess of disgusting poachers.<br />
<br />
Incidentally, baby orangutans are place in wheelbarrows, whether they being rescued or because they are going to a rehab activity, because they have little legs that aren’t made for long walks. They are adapted to live their lives in trees and accordingly have strong arms and hands. There are plenty of photos and videos of adorable baby orangutans in wheelbarrows on the Internet if you want to laugh and cry.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, for me it’s more tears than laughter. As cute as they are, they belong in the rainforest with their mothers, not in wheelbarrows. Those images, and those responsible, will haunt me the rest of my life.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-61541792412537115652018-03-29T06:39:00.001-04:002018-06-10T22:19:13.425-04:00288. Attacks on survivors are unconscionableEvery time there has been a school shooting in the past, it seems that we went from “thoughts and prayers” to “it’s too soon to talk about it” to “stop using this as a political issue.”<br />
<br />
Time passes and nothing ever happens.<br />
<br />
But after the school shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida, these kids from Parkland stood up and said it’s time to do something — now! They grabbed the attention of the country and led conversations, protests, and marches. Enough was enough.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, we live in a country now where we attack others rather than try to understand. The discourse around these kids has been nothing short of embarrassing. Calling them paid actors, referencing Tide pods, asking who is paying for the marches, photo-shopping leaders, and even suggesting they learn CPR.<br />
<br />
NBC reported that rocker Jesse Hughes — the Eagles of Death Metal singer who survived the 2015 terrorist attack in Paris —“criticize(d) Parkland student leader Emma Gonzalez as ‘the awful face of treason’ and a ‘survivor of nothing.’”<br />
<br />
Of course, it’s all about changing the subject. No longer able to defend this disturbing part of American culture and its inexcusable lack of action, NRA supporters have resorted to personal attacks on these teenagers. Those on the right, particularly the alt-right, attack them relentlessly on social media. Some suggest they are too young to have an opinion. I would argue that when they have been a victim of a mass shooting — running for their lives, watching their friends get slaughtered — then they sure as hell get to have an opinion.<br />
<br />
You can disagree with those who feel we need better gun control without acting like an insensitive imbecile. Bullets kill conservatives and liberals, blacks and whites, Christians and Muslims, and both the rich and poor. Why does a sensible question about gun control infuriate those on the right? At least the congressmen and congresswomen who receive large amounts of NRA contributions have a financial motive to sit on their hands. But what about everyone else?<br />
<br />
The Second Amendment is not going away, ever. One reasonable starting point in the discussion of gun control is to stop misstating the issue. What these kids and most reasonable people want to discuss is how to keep guns out of the hands of those who may use them to kill others. An Internet meme said it perfectly: “When you strip away all the partisanship, the simple fact is kids are dying and they’d rather not. They are asking for help. From adults. That’s it.”<br />
<br />
The arguments, such as the “what abouts,” are stupid and irrelevant. What about knives? What about cars? In fact, when you look at the arguments made by those on the right, they run the full spectrum of desperation from straw man arguments to appeals to ignorance, false dichotomies, slippery slopes, and red herrings. “Those kids should be in school. Liberals are communists.” They are futile attempts to justify their cognitive dissonance.<br />
<br />
From polls to protests, how much clearer does the American public need to be before our legislators do something? Americans simply want to discuss the availability and ease in which the wrong people obtain assault weapons, whether it is banning them, instilling age restrictions, or improving background checks.<br />
<br />
So enough is enough. But the “enough” is not just the lack of congressional action on gun control, it is also enough of the unyielding attacks on these students.<br />
<br />
Stand-up comedian Todd Hollowman tweeted, “Imagine being the kind of person who is more outraged at kids walking out of school in protest than at kids being carried out of school in body bags.”<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, we don’t have to imagine.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-59016060592884099082018-03-15T06:38:00.000-04:002018-06-10T22:19:04.819-04:00287. We’ve forgotten the common goodAs I have mentioned in this column before, I am a big fan of former labor secretary and economist Robert Reich.<br />
<br />
Rarely do I share near total agreement with someone and their particular view of the world. However, when I saw the title of his new book, “The Common Good,” I thought we might finally deviate in our perspectives. I often state that I think we should do what’s best for everyone, not what’s best for me personally. But I have grown quite cynical the last couple years, losing faith in people and our society.<br />
<br />
Reich even notes that despair: “Some of you may feel such a quest to be hopeless. The era we are living in offers too many illustrations of greed, narcissism, and hatefulness.”<br />
<br />
You know the saying “misery loves company.” And I have been quite miserable. So, with a roll of the eyes, I began reading the book.<br />
<br />
And then, of course, he nails it:<br />
<br />
“A love of country based on common good entails obligations to other people, not national symbols. Instead of demanding display of respect for the flag and anthem, it requires that all of us take on a fair share of the burden of keeping the nation going — that we pay our taxes in full rather than seek tax loopholes or squirrel away money abroad, that we volunteer time and energy to improving our community and county, serve on school boards and city council, refrain from political contributions that corrupt our politics and blow the whistle on abuses of power even at the risk of losing our jobs. It has sometimes required the supreme sacrifice.”<br />
<br />
The common good is about sharing the virtues of our country (and our planet). We are better when we lift the quality of life of everyone. It is not just about seeking the rewards, but also sharing the sacrifice.<br />
<br />
In business, it is about returning the interest of stakeholders and not just the shareholders. Stakeholders include not just the owners/investors, but also employees, suppliers, creditors, and the community. Corporations used to consider both shareholders and stakeholders in their business decisions—they were a part of the community,<br />
<br />
However, Reich noted that in the 1980s, “a wholly different understanding about the purpose of the corporation emerged.” Corporate raiders, “targeted companies that could deliver higher returns to the shareholders if they abandoned their other stakeholders — fighting unions, cutting the pay of workers or firing them, automating as many jobs as possible, and abandoning their original communities by shuttering factories and moving jobs to a state with lower labor costs, or moving them abroad.”<br />
<br />
It became about the prosperity of the few at the expense of others.<br />
<br />
To achieve the common good, we will need leaders that not only serve to financial interests, but also the trust and integrity of institutions they serve, whether it is business or government. Reich quotes Shimon Peres, who said, “We need a generation that sees leadership as a noble cause, defined not by personal ambition, but by morality and a call to service.” Reich summarizes, “The purpose of leadership is not simply to win. It is to serve.”<br />
<br />
Undeniably, we live in a winner-take-all society. Successful people are admired and honored, often ignoring the means of that success, including moral digressions and ethical sacrifices. Reich writes, “little or no attention is given to how they obtained their wealth. They may have avoided or skirted laws, paid off politicians, engaged in insider trading or price fixing, defrauded investors, or even brought the world economy to near ruin because of their disregard for the consequences of their schemes… The subtle message is that the common good doesn’t really count. Wealth and power do.”<br />
<br />
There is much more to the book, which I highly recommend. He writes a lot about education as a common good and the benefits of civic duty. The underlying message is that we need to start changing our priorities and definitions of success. There is nothing wrong with personal ambition and obtaining success, but there is no reason you can’t help others when you get there.<br />
<br />
And we need to redefine patriotism. We need to stop with the grandstanding and the belief that, for example, protesting the NFL is some sort of patriotic activity. In addition to thanking our service members for their sacrifices, we need to make our own. We need to engage in the political process, researching candidates and issues and removing the money that is corrupting our democracy. We need to hold accountable those who break the rules and take advantage of others.<br />
<br />
Working toward the common good is the ultimate expression of patriotism. Our country is stronger together.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-62582615846237905492018-02-28T06:36:00.000-05:002018-06-10T22:18:56.492-04:00286. Where does all that money go?A typical day to consider in 2016.<br />
<br />
It’s Friday, nice outside, and you’re looking forward to the weekend. You’re running a little late, so you get the kids off to school and head out the door.<br />
<br />
Coffee sounds good to start the day, so you run through the McDonald’s drive-through. You pass on the breakfast sandwich and hurry off. You might not know, but the CEO of McDonald’s, Stephan Easterbrook, was compensated $15.35 million in 2016. From his yacht somewhere in the Pacific, he is thankful for your support.<br />
<br />
On the way, you check your iPhone to make sure your kids made it to school without forgetting anything. You’re surprised to learn in a news alert that Tim Cook of Apple only made a modest $8.75 million. However, to run that phone, you’re on the Verizon network. Good choice — at least that’s what Lowell Mcadam was thinking when he was raking in $17.67 million.<br />
<br />
You’re low on gas and better stop for a quick fill-up. Exxon Mobile can help with that. Rex Tillerson, the 2016 CEO, is happy to be of service at a cost of $27.39 million. You saved some money and packed your lunch, but run in to get a Diet Coke. Compared to Rex, J. Frank Harrison of Coca-Cola is a bargain at $11.36 million.<br />
<br />
Finally, you head to your job at Parker Hannifin, where thankfully you are a full-time employee and not one of the contract employees they have been using increasingly. You are lucky to work for a Fortune 500 company. The CEO, who you’ve probably never met, made $10.78 million. He thanks you for your hard work and for voting down the union again. They’ve canceled the company picnic but were forthcoming in suggesting that you should vote Republican in the next election.<br />
<br />
It’s a long day but it’s payday and that picks up your spirits. Your salary is directly deposited into Key Bank, where CEO Beth Mooney cashed in on $8.17 million of executive pay. Your mortgage is automatically withdrawn today too, saving a stamp. Wells Fargo, when its not making up fake accounts, is happy to service your loan and the CEO does so at $13.01 million.<br />
<br />
After work, you run to the doctor to check your diabetes. The doctor says a prescription or two will keep it under control and so off you go to CVS to fill your prescription. CEO Larry Merlo is happy to fill that for you and his share is $18.36 million. The drug is made by Pfizer and you would think with a compensation of $17.32 million, CEO Ian Read would have cured cancer or something.<br />
<br />
Dinner with the family is at Cheesecake Factory. It’s your one night out a week. The meal for a family of four is close to $200 with an appetizer and overpriced cheesecake for everyone. One person eating well is CEO David Overton. With compensation of almost $6 million, he can take his family anywhere he wants — anywhere in the world.<br />
<br />
Wanting to get those hotel points, you wittingly use your American Express card, to the pleasure of Kenneth Chenault and his $17.46 million compensation package.<br />
<br />
Exhausted, you sit down to watch a little television before bed. There is a reality show on CBS where people are stuck on an island. Les Moonves, CEO of CBS Corporation, can actually afford to buy that island with a compensation of $69.55 million. Of course, you watch the show on your cable provider, Charter Communications, where CEO Thomas Rutledge just missed the $100 million mark in 2016. Better luck next year, Tom!<br />
<br />
We have just touched the surface of the impact corporations have on our lives. Besides live the American dream for another week, you made the wealthy even wealthier and made the powerful more powerful. You and the millions of us across the country do this on a daily basis, to the delight of the one percent.<br />
<br />
It is not just executive pay that corporations spend their money on. They also spend billions upon billions on lobbyists and campaign contributions to protect their interests.<br />
<br />
At the end of the day, we should ask two things of our economic system:<br />
<br />
1. If corporations have this much profit to spend on executive pay, lobbying, and campaign contributions, why did Republicans give them an additional tax break?<br />
<br />
2. If corporations have this much profit to spend on executive pay, lobbying, and campaign contributions, why can’t they pay their employees sustainable wages to not only help them in their lives but also raise the community they live in?<br />
<br />
Note: 2016 CEO compensation provided by AFL-CIO CEO pay watch.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-63729481693041203442018-02-22T06:34:00.000-05:002018-06-10T22:18:45.162-04:00285. Old friendships, divergent philosophiesPerhaps like many, my first venture into social media was Myspace.<br />
<br />
After setting up my page, I didn’t do much with it and it sort of slowly disappeared from my attention. I really didn’t get it. So I wasn’t really interested in joining Facebook, in part because I was in law school at the onset of its popularity and because I thought it was just like Myspace.<br />
<br />
Then one day my wife was on Facebook when I looked at her screen and noticed a close friend of mine from high school who I had been casually searching for. He was one of the few high school friends I kept in contact for a while after starting college, even writing letters back and forth. Somewhere along the way we lost touch, but I was excited now to find him.<br />
<br />
I quickly joined Facebook and contacted him. I caught up with not only him but also other friends from high school and college. I couldn’t believe how quickly I was reacquainted with old friends. Some I remembered well; others I hardly knew. I enjoyed the perpetual class reunion, learning about the lives of classmates, such as their families, jobs, and where they were living.<br />
<br />
I didn’t talk much about politics in high school. I didn’t run for class president, nor did I join the debate team. We might comment on a current event but we had no political philosophies and were largely oblivious to the ways of the world. I liked Ronald Reagan, everyone seemed to, though I really didn’t know why. I do remember trickle down economics and I thought it made sense at the time.<br />
<br />
I was more interested in sports, my studies (math in particular), and of course girls. Our memories were filled with baseball games, swimming, movies, rooting for Cleveland sport teams and many late nights trying to figure out the opposite sex. I guess I just assumed that being such good friends growing up, and sharing those “teenage moments,” that we would grow up with similar belief and values. They were like family, after all.<br />
<br />
But times change and people change and it turns out that many of my friends don’t share similar viewpoints. To be fair, I probably changed more than they did. Not many people from rural American grow up to be an agnostic liberal vegetarian with political views leaning democratic socialist.<br />
<br />
When you’re a convicted idealist, and its tied to personal morality, it’s hard to grow a former relationship with someone perhaps as oppositely passionate. Too many issues like guns, animal compassion, Trump, and religion are deal-breakers to resume a close, in-depth friendship (as opposed to a friendship).<br />
<br />
The memories of yesteryear are sometimes more valuable than the realities of today. It’s better that those memories stay there in that time of my life. We shared a meaningful time in our lives and had so many great memories — but that was then and this is now. We’re different people and there is not going to be any “The Hangover” type reunions. And it’s OK — some relationships grow into old age while others fizzle out. It doesn’t change the past and I wouldn’t want to. It’s emotional and a little sad, but we just see the world differently now.<br />
<br />
On the flip side, I suppose, there are high school classmates that I really didn’t associate with much growing up but with whom now share a lot of common values. I often think it would be fun to get together and talk about our paths and how we arrived at a common worldview.<br />
<br />
Perhaps form new relationships, thanks to Facebook.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-56766631899227707192018-02-12T14:05:00.004-05:002018-06-10T22:18:32.517-04:00284. Not just any jobs will do<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Jobs, jobs, jobs. Despite 88 straight months of job growth, it’s still a major priority in our communities. It’s also the promise of almost every politician.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Obviously, if it were that easy to create jobs, it wouldn’t continue as a concern in communities across the country. And it is not just any job that counts — people need jobs that provide a sustainable wage and benefits like health insurance, retirement planning, sick days, and vacation time.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
But creating jobs is actually a complex challenge, especially in areas that have lost major industries that used to support them. Driving through Lorain can almost bring one to tears with all the empty buildings and idle factories. It’s not unlike hundreds of other communities across the country, including most that rose to prominence built on industries like steel, coal, and automobiles. Towns that relied on manufacturing for taxes and jobs are suffering.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
So, when it comes to reviving a community, what comes first: the businesses that improve them or the people who welcome them?</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Companies need infrastructure so that employees and patrons can easily travel to their business. They need safety because they don’t want to have to worry about being robbed and customers need to feel safe to shop. They need customers who have disposable income to spend — a great product at a great price is useless if customers don’t have the money to buy it. They need an educated and skilled workforce. Cities are relentlessly competing for businesses, which are looking for economic advantages, whether it is tax breaks or other incentives. A successful retail district benefits other thriving businesses.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Communities and the governments that run them likewise need jobs. Jobs provide the income necessary to support local businesses. Jobs also provide taxes to government, which will be able to provide infrastructure needs and safety assurances that businesses need. An increase in income often means nice neighborhoods and increasing home values as houses are fixed up or new developments are built. Nicer homes and nice communities attract people with the skills necessary to build a reliable workforce.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
In order to improve safety and infrastructure, cities need more money, often in the form of taxes. But if the communities can’t afford to pay more, you can’t tax them into poverty. At the same time, if the city becomes more run down because it cannot afford to improve infrastructure and safety, then it is going to have a hard time attracting the businesses that will provide jobs and generate tax revenue.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
So if you can’t improve your community through taxes because people can’t afford them, then it’s difficult to attract business that might make paying more taxes affordable.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Going backward is rarely a realistic opportunity. While businesses often go back to their core values, it is difficult for government and communities. The world moves too fast. There is too much competition and too many alternatives. This problem, of course, is the availability of cheap labor throughout the world and a company’s willingness to move to acquire it.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The theory of economies of scale is built upon finding the cheapest labor, infrastructure, and natural resources to build a business, lowering the cost of production and improving the ability to compete against other businesses in a capitalistic society.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
So, what happens when a community loses its competitive advantage in a market like steel? Some suggest tariffs, but tariffs raise prices. It might be good for American steel workers but it is not good for those who purchase steel. For free market purists, it is a loss in efficiency. It’s why people support capitalism so long as it works for them. Cheaper imported steel is the definition of a free market society and capitalism. For American steel companies to compete without tariffs often requires lowering wages (or going out of business). Profit becomes a race to the bottom.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Communities looking for economic recovery often need to reinvent themselves. They need to adopt a new identity, maximizing any economic advantages it might have, such as new technology, alternative industries, or using its natural resources. And like any business, government needs to invest in itself to attract those opportunities. It must balance the needs and economic situations of its citizens with the cost of improving the community to attract business. For this, it needs dedicated public officials willing to work tirelessly to attack this quandary from all angles.</div>
<div style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #444444; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; orphans: 4; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
It also needs committed citizens to take pride in their city, even in difficult times, to attract opportunities.</div>
Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-76284332659028728842018-01-24T22:18:00.000-05:002018-06-10T22:18:16.320-04:00283. Here's to our small business ownersGrowing up, our family had two distinct sources of income.<br />
<br />
Primarily, my father worked for General Motors. As part of the auto workers’ union, he received good pay and excellent benefits. He worked hard, rarely missed work until later in life, and provided for his family. We all knew that our lifestyle was dependent on my father and his employment at General Motors.<br />
<br />
The other was small business. My parents ran several very small businesses, mostly retail, in the North Eaton area. In fact, all of the businesses were located in the same little shopping center. My father, ever the entrepreneur, was not afraid of risk. My mom, always the willing partner, ran the businesses. We started with a doughnut shop/restaurant where I often spent time earning a few dollars after school selling lottery tickets and eating bacon cheeseburgers. Putting to use what I’d learned in an art class, I was proud to design and paint the business sign. It was the first of our community business, where you really got meet and know the people that made up your town.<br />
<br />
Then — my father’s champion vision — we open a video rental store (we started with both VHS and Beta). We it built from scratch and I remember putting the final touches on the place while watching the NCAA Final Four on a small television. It was my favorite business because it provided my friends and me with thousands of free movies. I also opened my own sports card shop within the video store, which was my first venture into entrepreneurship. I worked there many summers and evenings.<br />
<br />
When video started losing steam, my father got excited about screen printing and bought a small business. I would come home on weekends and build screens for my mom. Archaic in the way the printing business works today, it was a lot of work and pressing deadlines.<br />
<br />
Finally, my mom went to cosmetology school and became a beautician. We bought the local hair salon, which included tanning beds (and of course free haircuts). When she retired from this business, she did so having successfully managed several small businesses.<br />
<br />
It is not surprising then that I have a special place in my heart for small businesses. For most, they are family businesses with everyone contributing, and often surpass the notion of a 40-hour week. Many family meal discussions focused on the way to improve business or the brainstorming of new ideas. Small businesses are the heart of our communities, and ours was no different. I remember the excitement of my parents hosting my sister’s softball team at our restaurant for breakfast before a tournament game.<br />
<br />
Over several years, I got to interview and write about more than 100 small businesses in Lorain County. From barber shops to pet-sitting, it was an assignment I embraced as much as I was tasked. Many of them were the same stories I grew up with — the pursuit of ambition, debating ideas, taking risks, and realizing dreams. Some of the businesses were well considered and destined to thrive; others I cringed at the unlikelihood of success. I never want to see a business fail and the dreams die. At times, I wanted to start a small business consulting business, putting to use my experiences growing up in combination with my studies in business and law.<br />
<br />
And that is the real point of this column. Managing small businesses, particularly new small businesses, is hard work. They are subject to all the same challenges of large companies — industry regulations, overhead expenses, insurance, employment laws, marketing, accounting — but have to do it with fewer resources. They are inspired by passion as much as profit but often compete with those only chasing profit. Small business owners work long hours and there are no such thing as sick days or paid vacations. For many, they have little room for error, often sweating payroll or losing sleep over next month’s rent. They rely on employees they often can’t offer benefits and suppliers willing to sell small quantities at reasonable prices. But most of all, they rely on customers. They hope that customers will make the effort to consider their business, even if is an extra stop or costs a few more dollars.<br />
<br />
There is perhaps nothing more powerful than where we spend our dollars. We decide which companies succeed or fail. Our purchases should reflect our values and we need to place a greater value on the economic heartbeat of this country.<br />
<br />
From retail and service businesses to small manufacturing, they deserve our business.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-81102421989125255822018-01-12T11:52:00.004-05:002018-01-12T11:52:36.125-05:00282. Wealthy companies, welfare workforceA report from Policy Matters Ohio detailed that Amazon, now one of Ohio’s largest employers, has risen among the ranks of companies that find their employees receiving government assistance due to low or unsustainable wages.<br />
<br />
Research director Zach Schiller noted there were 1,430 Amazon employees or family members getting assistance under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program as of last August, according to the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. “That ranked the company 19th among all Ohio employers. Just months before, it wasn’t even in the top 50,” he said.<br />
<br />
Of course, it’s not just Amazon, as other companies such as Wal-Mart often leave their employees needing more. Plain Dealer reporter Janet Cho wrote in 2016 that Ohio’s median wage is over $16 an hour, and “it’s clear that Wal-Mart remains a force pulling that median wage downward. As of last year, 14,114 Walmart employees and family members qualified for food stamps in Ohio, because the family member who worked at Wal-Mart was paid so little.”<br />
<br />
You may recall that last year Amazon accepted proposals from across the country to build their second headquarters. “We expect to invest over $5 billion in construction and grow this second headquarters to include as many as 50,000 high-paying jobs – it will be a full equal to our current campus in Seattle,” the company announced. “In addition to Amazon’s direct hiring and investment, construction and ongoing operation of Amazon HQ2 is expected to create tens of thousands of additional jobs and tens of billions of dollars in additional investment in the surrounding community.”<br />
<br />
Desperate for jobs, cities from Lorain to Atlanta sent in proposals offering Amazon billions in tax breaks and other incentives. PBS reported, “Some candidates have focused their bids on generous incentive packages. In pitching Newark, N.J., offered $7 billion in tax incentives, property tax abatements, and breaks from the local wage tax. California will offer $300 million in tax incentives over several years if one of its cities is picked.”<br />
<br />
It is the evolution of a market economy, or perhaps the result of it, that local governments have to compete for businesses that offer jobs and tax revenue. And while the resulting public and private partnerships and agreements may be good for the local economy, too often local governments serve at the mercy of businesses.<br />
<br />
As complicated as that can be, it is inexcusable that these businesses — often very profitable international corporations — do not pay their employees a level above public assistance.<br />
<br />
This country flourishes with a strong middle class. And a strong middle class means that workers of major corporations should not need to be subsidized by taxpayers to cover their basic needs. Henry Ford paid his employees $5 per day (more than double the average factor wage at the time, and about $15.40 per hour in today’s currency when adjusted for inflation) to not only stabilize his workforce, but also create a class of people who could afford his product.<br />
<br />
Yet, here we are. Cities compete for companies through tax breaks and other incentives and the federal government made life even easier by giving corporations a tax break. Shareholders, CEOs, and other executives make millions while their employees cannot afford to feed their families. And the thought of a $15 minimum wage (which is barely more than $30,000 per year) with affordable health care is somehow considered absurd.<br />
<br />
It is far from absurd, in fact, it should be a requirement for any company receiving corporate welfare. If governments are asked to create favorable business environments, then businesses should take care of their employees. Government shouldn’t have to do both.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com16tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-84143652514539245552018-01-07T21:46:00.002-05:002018-01-07T22:01:22.954-05:00281. Tax cut amounts to briberyOur American democracy — that is, our representative society — means to most that those elected to office will serve those who elected to them, not just those who got them elected.<br />
<br />
It also means that important issues in America society, like taxes, should be carefully presented and considered. They should be debated, deliberated, explained, and revised as necessary. Something as important as taxes should aim at bipartisan consideration and should certainly factor public opinion.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, none of those things mattered to congressional Republicans, who quickly passed, along party lines, a bill that wasn’t debated, a bill they knew little about, and a bill that ignored public opinion. The unpopular $1.5 trillion tax bill (a Harvard CAPS-Harris survey found 64 percent opposed the bill) provides big tax breaks to corporations and the wealthy.<br />
<br />
The average tax cuts in 2018, according to the Tax Policy Center, look like this:<br />
<br />
• Households making less than $25,000: $60.<br />
<br />
• Middle class households: $900.<br />
<br />
• Top one percent: $51,000.<br />
<br />
• For corporations, the tax rate will decline from 35 percent to 21 percent.<br />
<br />
Of course, these are just averages and will differ by individual and entity.<br />
<br />
Considering that the country is already $20 trillion in debt, Republicans have forever given up their ability to complain about the national debt, as this bill may add another trillion (what happened to the Tea Party anyway?). It may also threaten Medicare and Social Security.<br />
<br />
For individuals, the cut for middle and lower class households basically adds up to a bribe for large tax breaks on the wealthy. Many social media comments include those who say they are happy as long as the bill reduces their own taxes. But it is a matter of perspective — $60 is a couple tanks of gas, $900 is a set of tires, but $51,000 is a small house, a modest Jaguar, or a decent boat. Of course, $51,000 over 10 years is $500,000 and the possibilities are nearly endless. As a member of the middle class — you’re welcome!<br />
<br />
The biggest fallacy is that the reduction in corporate tax rates will lead to more jobs and higher wages. Taxes are an expense, and when you reduce expenses, you increase profits. Corporate executives and shareholders seem to have an affinity for profits and bonuses, dividends, and higher stock prices. After outsourcing production, busting unions, and increasing corporate welfare, reducing taxes are all that remains. Sure, it could lead to investment and innovation (hopefully not machines that replaces workers), but this is about greed and political influence. If the corporate tax cut is so good for the American workers, why not include an increase in the minimum wage? It’s trickle down and it hasn’t worked — it doesn’t work.<br />
<br />
Of course, President Donald Trump, fresh off of his second Politifact “Lie of the Year” Award, is as boisterous as ever, claiming this is a “middle class miracle” and that it essentially repeals Obamacare. It isn’t and it doesn’t.<br />
<br />
In fact, economist Robert Reich called it “unbridled greed, utter disdain for the rest of America, and a cynical assumption they can get away with anything by repeatedly lying through their teeth.”<br />
<br />
Goodbye democracy, welcome oligarchy.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-20593708401148847112017-12-01T22:00:00.000-05:002018-01-07T22:01:12.534-05:00280. We didn’t used to worry about itGrowing up, we lived for backyard football. After baseball season, we played as much as we could — in the rain, mud, and snow. We didn’t care. We played with neighbors, friends, family (including my sister) and our yard was perfectly set up for a small field. There were no video games, cell phones, or Facebook. We spent our time outside.<br />
<br />
My parents never sent us to sports camps, training centers, or paid for private coaching. They handed us a football and opened the backdoor — go play!<br />
<br />
I would give anything to have some video of those backyard games. They could get pretty intense.<br />
<br />
I played pee-wee football and through ninth grade at Midview before deciding that baseball should be my focus. But I still loved football.<br />
<br />
In about 1983, when I was 15 or so, my dad decided to start a touch football league. He called the local elementary school and asked if we could use the field a dozen or so Sundays a year. Surprisingly, they gave us permission. My dad then put an advertisement in the local paper to get players and form teams.<br />
<br />
I don’t remember all the details; we had probably six teams. The rules were made very simple: Each game consisted of a set number of plays (rather than having to work a clock) and first downs were permanently defined about 20 yards apart, so we didn’t need first down markers. We played, I believe, seven on seven, and I am guessing the field was 80 yards long and proportionally wide. We paid for a couple of officials, but the league was affordable, something like $20 per person plus the cost of a jersey.<br />
<br />
It was so much fun. We would get up each Sunday morning to go line the fields and spent all morning at the field. We would then come home, watch the Browns, and talk about our games. The games were competitive, and we had playoffs to crown a champion. There is still of photo of my dad’s team at my mom’s house from the year they won the championship. I don’t recall much fighting or complaining, other than a call here or there (but I may have forgotten). The guys, ranging from 40s to us teens, were just happy to play and have someone organize it.<br />
<br />
At the time, I thought nothing of it. When my dad wanted to do something, he usually made a run at it — sometimes it worked out, sometimes it didn’t. I didn’t appreciate his ambition until much later in life.<br />
<br />
Looking back, it is quite remarkable. I can’t imagine doing something like that today on a small scale. There are lots of flag football leagues, but they are much more formal. I can’t imagine a school letting someone use their field with such a simple request. There was no insurance and players played at their own risk. It was just a bunch of guys getting together to have fun, burn off some energy, and hang out with friends.<br />
<br />
Now, just to run a 5K race, many organizations require insurance to use their facilities and runners and walkers have to sign a waiver. I don’t deny we were lucky — someone could have gotten seriously injured and sued us and the school district. But I also feel like it was a different time.<br />
<br />
Today, so much of life is bogged down with formality, liability, and worry. Things don’t happen because people worry about everything — what if this happens, what if that happens? It’s often paralyzing. Things take so long, meandering through permissions, legality, and formality that sometimes people just give up. It seems we live in a scared society.<br />
<br />
Understandably, people do look for the opportunity to sue. Accidents don’t just happen anymore. There is no such thing as bad luck. Somebody is at fault; someone is responsible. So some of that fear is warranted, I grimly admit.<br />
<br />
I am glad that my dad wasn’t scared because those are some of my favorite memories with him. Doing something you love with your friends and father — what could be better?Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-88383762663882100172017-11-17T21:59:00.000-05:002018-01-07T22:01:00.772-05:00279. Bump Bailey, Birdie, and betrayalWe lost our beloved dogs — Petey, the handsome pit bull mix, and Sky, our semi-famous and talkative greyhound — within a month of each other in late Summer 2015.<br />
<br />
For different reasons, we are still not over either one of them. Petey was a loyal friend who had a rough go of it early in his life. Tattooed on my arm, he will be with me forever. I see his beautiful face every morning in the mirror. Sky also had a rough time finding a home, being passed back and forth several times. I felt a mental connection with him — I could start a conversation just by giving him “that look.” A victim of bone cancer, a common curse among greyhounds, I will never get his pain out of my head.<br />
<br />
Suddenly we were down to one dog, but we needed some time before looking for another. Bump Bailey lavished in the attention as he tried to fill our broken hearts.<br />
<br />
Eventually we decided it was time to add to our family and hoped that Bailey would like to have a companion. He got along well, from the first moment with Petey and Sky, so we weren’t worried that he would take issue letting another dog into our house.<br />
<br />
We were mistaken.<br />
<br />
We tried to introduce him to three other dogs of his size and mixed breed. We searched animal shelter and rescue groups and took him to test compatibility. Bailey wasn’t having it. One adorable little dog couldn’t get even get in the driveway. Another would not leave Bailey alone, pestering him and testing his patience. Still another couldn’t even pass the sniff test.<br />
<br />
The process was difficult as it broke our hearts to see all the dogs that needed a home. Ready to give up, we thought we would try a greyhound. They are big, sometimes independent, and Bailey got along well with Sky. We found one that needed a home, a beautiful brindle named Birdie. The foster family was leaving for a weekend and we thought we would invite Birdie over and give it a try.<br />
<br />
We slowly introduced her to our home and everything went well. She was sweet and loving and quickly made herself at home. We thought we had another dog.<br />
<br />
But Bailey pouted. Really pouted.<br />
<br />
Normally, Bailey was always on top of me, wrestling or playing with his squeaky toy. He cuddled with my wife in her chair. He actually laid on the desk when we worked in the office. He just had this infectious silly attitude and loved life.<br />
<br />
While Bailey didn’t engage with Birdie, we noticed that he was separating himself from us. He sat in the corner of the room, wouldn’t play, and wouldn’t cuddle. He slept on the floor rather than our bed. It’s like we betrayed him, breaking his heart.<br />
<br />
It also broke ours and we sadly returned Birdie when the foster family came home.<br />
<br />
What we didn’t expect was Bailey to hold a grudge, but he did. Even after Birdie left, he ignored us, slept on the floor, wouldn’t play. He knows that when I get down on the floor, it’s play time — his tail wagging rapidly as he runs to get his toy. But now, he would literally leave the room.<br />
<br />
It was sort of unbelievable. Dogs are supposed to love unconditionally, and we wondered if we would get our Bailey back. Then we left for vacation and we were gone for 16 days. When we got back, things slowly returned to normal. We now do everything we used to do. I think he missed us and decided it was time to forgive us.<br />
<br />
It’s hard not rescuing another dog; my wife had to take herself off all the rescue sites. But Bailey is my best friend and I can’t hurt his feelings again. He might be selfish with our love, but he doesn’t know different. After all, he spent months in a quiet, cold cage all by himself. I can’t imagine how miserable he must have been.<br />
<br />
Like any relationship, there are up and downs. It’s been a rough couple of years for all of us, but we worked it out.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-41709023179230644192017-10-26T21:28:00.000-04:002017-11-02T21:28:41.961-04:00278. Photography is the art of the realI have enjoyed photography for several years now; it’s something I do purely for leisure.<br />
<br />
While I do enter photo contests such as the Lorain County Fair and Erie Shore Photography Club, it’s really just for fun. I appreciate the feedback and the chance to improve my skills. Honestly, I am interested in learning beyond the basics of photography but not the intricacies of professional photography. I favor taking my camera with me when I travel to get photos but do not normally engage in “photo shoots.” I take the best photo I can.<br />
<br />
Occasionally I get a good photograph. But then, the odds are on my side — the ability to take thousands of photographs with digital cameras and get a few good ones is simple math.<br />
<br />
I took a college course that included developing our own film a long time ago. But even with the digital camera, the more I learn about photography, the more I feel like an amateur. In this age in which almost everyone has a pretty good camera on their cell phone, good photographers are underappreciated.<br />
<br />
People will sometimes say, “That’s a nice photo, you must have a good camera.” That’s both true and a little simplistic. Good photos by good photographers take a lot of skill and preparation. There are many factors that go into a great photo. On the other hand, the “auto mode” on cameras is pretty good and the distinction between professionals and amateurs is often subtle.<br />
<br />
For me, there are several aspects to photography. One aspect is to preserve the moments in our lives. These are the natural photos captured in the spontaneous course of an activity. These might include birthdays or graduations. The goal is a nice photo to commemorate the event, not necessarily to get an award-winning shot.<br />
<br />
There is also photography for documentation. If I saw the extinct Dodo bird in my backyard, I’d sure want a photo to document it. Similarly, photography can document the activities of our lives. While I would like to get the best photo ever of the Grand Canyon, my photos also serve to record my time and experience there.<br />
<br />
But there is some controversy within photography. I learned some tips at a talk given by a professional photographer and he described the extent a photographer will go to get his or her shot. He described an advertisement he did portraying a volleyball player diving in the sand. Of course, in reality it was a model, lying on a bench (out of sight) angled into the sand and dozens of takes of someone tossing the ball to her.<br />
<br />
Photography competitions often permit photographers to take advantage of the tools available in post-production. These tools have a wide range of detail, effects, and alternations designed to improve photos. Some are simple, such as cropping or converting a photo to black and white. Others are more complicated and dramatically alter the image. At a recent competition, there was a beautiful photo of an owl with a badly injured eye. A judge suggested that a photographer could copy the good eye and cover up the bad eye. When the images are altered to the extreme, it perhaps represents more of an image of art than a product of photography.<br />
<br />
Similar to many perspectives in life where science and technology can modify reality, photos can be changed so much that they are no longer authentic. For me, a photograph should represent truth as the visual depiction of a place in moment and time taken to be preserved, treasured, or shared. Enhanced pictures should maintain the integrity of that being photographed. If an object or landscape is photographed, it should exist in reality. A picture of the Empire State Building should represent the truth of the building at the moment in time. When a photographer starts adding clouds and removing people, it no longer represents the reality of the moment.<br />
<br />
If the photo is altered to the point that it is no longer represents that which it purports to have photographed, it has, in my opinion, crossed over to art — and represents how the photographer interpreted the moment and not what is inherently suggested by the photo itself. It succeeds and is appreciated as art, but the distinction should be noted.<br />
<br />
Declan O’Neill, writing about a photographer who was stripped of his title as “Photographer of the Year,” noted the distinction: “But for the ‘purists’ his accolade would have reinforced the idea that we can alter images in the name of ‘art’ and still claim they are photographs.”<br />
<br />
However, he also notes that “many photographers do not object to using Photoshop to enhance photographs but they do object to its use in altering photographs.” If an owl only has one eye, then he only has one eye. Life is not perfect.<br />
<br />
I appreciate and sometimes engage in the artistic aspect of photography. It is enjoyable and gratifying to take a photo and turn it into a creative “work of art.” I am not taking a moral stance on the issue — only that is difficult to know when a photographer has crossed that line. Regardless, the photographer should be honest as to the true nature of the picture.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-38453873070663823522017-10-09T21:27:00.000-04:002017-11-02T21:27:24.589-04:00277. Believe it, timing is everything My wife and I celebrated our 20-year anniversary this month. For the occasion, we decided to drive out west and see as many places as we could.<br />
<br />
Over 16 days we drove more than 4,500 miles through the heart of the country. We drove through deserts, mountains, rolling hills and over rivers. We traveled through cities, along Old Route 66, visited small towns, even ghost towns and over areas so flat you could see for miles. We got to enjoy the diversity of topography this country offers.<br />
<br />
The trip, however, also traveled along the country’s social and political spectrum. Our first stop was St Louis, Mo., one day after riots broke out after a white ex-police officer was acquitted for the killing of a black suspect. It was an up-close view of the racial tensions that still plague this country.<br />
<br />
From St. Louis we headed to Oklahoma City. Along the way, friends of a friend were attacking me, calling me an idiot and other expletives (which I am now used to) because I had the audacity to suggest that terrorists come in all colors and ideologies. After he shared a video of ISIS members proclaiming their hate for America, I sent a panoramic photo I took of the victims of the Oklahoma City bombing, the second worst terrorist attack on this country — committed by a white supremacist. The conversation quickly went silent.<br />
<br />
After leaving Oklahoma City we traveled to Flagstaff, Ariz., so that we could tour the Grand Canyon. Along the way we saw hundreds of wind turbines, which was encouraging. Unfortunately, we could also smell the factory farms miles before we saw them. We took a train ride from Williams, Ariz., complete with a staged train robbery, to the Grand Canyon. It was one of several national parks we visited. We also visited the Painted Desert, Petrified Forest, and Aches National Park. We rode scooters through Red Rock Canyon and quickly drove through a very crowded Zion National Park.<br />
<br />
Next was the mainstay of our vacation — Las Vegas.<br />
<br />
We had never been to Las Vegas, and it was someplace we wanted to visit at least once. When you’re getting older, you start thinking about these things. We’re not much for gambling, though enjoy a little from time to time, but wanted to experience the environment, energy, and shows. One of the days we spent touring the Hoover Dam and enjoyed a boat ride on Lake Mead. I enjoyed Las Vegas much more than I anticipated. The hotels and resorts are gigantic and just amazing. Over the course of out vacation, we took over 5,000 photographs.<br />
<br />
We left Las Vegas on Thursday, Sept. 28. Stephen Paddock checked in the same day. We could see Mandalay Bay from our hotel, and my newlywed niece stayed there just a week before we arrived.<br />
<br />
Every single terrorist attack or mass shooting is both heartbreaking and infuriating. However, it does feel a little different because we were just there. The randomness of these senseless acts triggers feelings of helplessness.<br />
<br />
As a country, maybe we are finally fed up with this. I don’t want to hear any more prayers, or cliche hashtags like #vegasstrong. Obviously, I support the communities and their way of dealing with the tragedies, but we keep allowing this to happen. I was having lunch with my mom when a politician got on television and said that we should not use this to further a political agenda. Others have said it is too soon to discuss gun control. I physically start to shake at the stupidity.<br />
<br />
For those who were killed, it’s already too late. Preventing mass shootings or at least making them more difficult is not a political agenda, and it is hypocritical to even suggest otherwise. Had the shooter been Muslim, President Donald Trump would have been on Twitter within minutes lauding himself and promoting his Muslim bans. Fox News would have salivated at the opportunity to promote its conservative agenda. For an outstanding article on this subject, read Thomas Friedman’s, “If Only Stephen Paddock Were a Muslim.” It is a flawless examination of this hypocrisy.<br />
<br />
Those who continue to do nothing in Congress, regardless of party and regardless of how much money he or she receives from the NRA, are, in partly responsible for each mass murder. Our founding fathers, when they wrote the Second Amendment, could not have anticipated the weaponry that exists today. Paddock had a ridiculous arsenal of weapons and nobody needs an automatic rifle or semi-automatic rifle. As the joke goes, if you need a AK-47 for hunting, then you suck as a hunter and need a new hobby. Of course, it’s not just gun control; it’s the American culture that promotes and glamorizes violence. It’s not unpatriotic to suggest that this country needs reasonable gun control.<br />
<br />
We finished our trip driving through Colorado on Saturday night on our way back to Ohio, and just a few hours later they got 14 inches of snow, closing the road we just traveled. We had great weather, cooler than it was here in Ohio. We were lucky to have a wonderful trip and celebration of our 20-year anniversary.<br />
<br />
It’s true, timing is everything.Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213563161790905628.post-8883130063903652402017-09-12T20:51:00.001-04:002017-09-12T21:02:08.361-04:00276. Time to band togetherNick Hanauer is a billionaire who exemplifies the American dream.<br />
<br />
He worked hard, started businesses, made wise investments. Yet, despite his personal success, he has expressed his concern about the growing inequalities in our country. He is brash and controversial, but asserts his beliefs and opinions without apology.<br />
<br />
In 2014, Hanauer wrote “The Pitchforks Are Coming… For Us Plutocrats,” for Politico and then recently reiterated his concerns in “To My Fellow Plutocrats: You Can Cure Trumpism.”<br />
<br />
The use of “pitchforks” provides the imagery:<br />
<br />
“But the problem isn’t that we have inequality. Some inequality is intrinsic to any high-functioning capitalist economy. The problem is that inequality is at historically high levels and getting worse every day. Our country is rapidly becoming less a capitalist society and more a feudal society. Unless our policies change dramatically, the middle class will disappear, and we will be back to late 18th-century France. Before the revolution.”<br />
<br />
Our economy is so large, it is easy to get lost in it. There is economic theory and political interest, for example. There are exaggerations, simplifications, red herrings, and lies. It is easy to laud the successful and demonize the unsuccessful. It is easy to blame the government, lobbyists, and legislatures.<br />
<br />
However, “us against them,” that is the 99 percent versus the one percent, is rarely united. There was Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party, but the opponents differed.<br />
<br />
Imagine that you were one of 300 people on a wealthy island. On this island, there was plenty of money and luxuries for everyone, but 20 percent of it is controlled by just three individuals. Of the $1 million in assets available, three people owned $200,000 of it. Of course, in truth, they control the other people through the essentials, like housing, labor, and food. The bottom 150 would be forced to share $80,000.<br />
<br />
So while the island had enough for everyone to have $3,333 each, half the people would only have $533. The “middle class” would get $1,866, while the three on the top each get $66,666 each.<br />
<br />
Why would the 150 people living on $533 not simply band together and take out the three individuals on the top and share the $200,000?<br />
<br />
This is what Hanauer is referencing. Eventually the people on the bottom will get tired of fighting each other for scraps and seek a more equitable society. He wrote:<br />
<br />
“And so I have a message for my fellow filthy rich, for all of us who live in our gated bubble worlds: Wake up, people. It won’t last.<br />
<br />
If we don’t do something to fix the glaring inequities in this economy, the pitchforks are going to come for us. No society can sustain this kind of rising inequality. In fact, there is no example in human history where wealth accumulated like this and the pitchforks didn’t eventually come out. You show me a highly unequal society, and I will show you a police state. Or an uprising. There are no counterexamples. None. It’s not if, it’s when.”<br />
<br />
The stakes are rising.<br />
<br />
People keep fighting for the $15 minimum wage (which Hanauer is an advocate for), overtime rules were recently overturned, and President Donald Trump and the Republicans want to reform taxes. In response, Hanauer started a Change.org petition against the tax cuts for the wealthy: “I believe that not one penny in tax cuts should go to millionaires, billionaires, and wealthy corporations. Everyone knows that the biggest lie in economics is that tax cuts for the rich create growth and jobs. When Republicans talk about tax reform, they’re really talking about trickle down nonsense.”<br />
<br />
I have been warning about the growing inequalities for years. But when I say it, I am a socialist. When poor people say it, they are told to work harder. Maybe people will listen when a rich person says it.<br />
<br />
The economy thrives when people earn sustainable wages. Hanauer agrees, “In plain English, the real economy is you: Raise wages, and one increases demand. Increase demand and one increases jobs, wages, and innovation. The real economy is simply the interplay between consumers and businesses.”<br />
<br />
The 99 percent needs to unite and say enough is enough. There is a difference between success and greed, and the top one percent has been very greedy for a long time. Put aside your partisan politics and join forces with your family, neighbors, and co-workers to demand a life better for all of us. The wealthy need to pay more taxes — much more in taxes. Corporations need to pay a sustainable minimum wage, pay overtime, stop catering to their wealthy shareholders, and stop hiding money overseas.<br />
<br />
Hanauer was recently on the wonderful program, “1A” with Joshua Johnson, to talk about his viewpoints. He said, “I assume that there are a third of the people in this country my message can never reach, there are third of the people who are too dumb to understand, or who are so tribalized.”<br />
<br />
When Johnson pointed out that people might not like being called dumb, Hanauer responded, “Luckily, I am not running for anything, so it doesn’t matter. I think we can create a consensus with the more rational two-thirds of the country.”Rob Swindellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08883247639974974929noreply@blogger.com0